Connect the Dots – Potential Cause of the 9/11 First Responder Illnesses and The Purposes Behind chemTrails

Energetic Materials as a Potential Cause of the 9/11 First Responder Illnesses

“Sulfur is often added to thermite mixtures to improve the burn qualities and it is then called thermate.”

by Kevin Ryan       February 4, 2011

The tragedy at the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11^th, 2001 continues to affect many thousands of first responders who sacrificed their own health while restoring lower Manhattan and attempting to recover survivors and victims’ remains.  Recently, H.R. 847, otherwise known as the James Zadroga Bill, was signed by President Obama in an effort to provide services and compensation for those whose health was compromised through exposure to the toxic dust and gases at Ground Zero.  However, these first responders also need help to understand how their illnesses originated so that improvements in treatment can be made.  In response to this need, concerned citizens should consider the possible correlation between evidence for energetic materials at the WTC and the environmental exposures which appear to have caused so many illnesses in the first responders.

The 9/11 first responders suffer from a range of different illnesses, some of which are rare in the general population.  Some of the illnesses can be attributed to the high pH of the WTC dust.  We know the extent of the pH problem thanks to EPA whistleblower, Dr. Cate Jenkins.[1] The very high pH of the dust inhaled by 9/11 first responders is a probable cause for the general deterioration of lungs and their function, due to the dust’s corrosive state.  As Dr. Jenkins wrote, “Corrosivity would have acted directly to cause respiratory chemical burns, and also would have increased the toxic properties of other pollutants from the WTC by facilitating their entry into the body through the respiratory system.”

Commonly observed conditions among first responders include reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS), caused by exposure to high concentrations of irritants such as caustic and metallic dusts; upper respiratory illnesses such as sinusitis and laryngitis; and lower respiratory disorders such as asthma and what is known as World Trade Center cough.

Less understood, and requiring further study, are unusual illnesses of the immune systemcommonly observed in the WTC first responders.  These include various types of interstitial lung disease, such as eosinophilic pneumonia, granulomatous pneumonitis, and bronchial obliterans.  Environmental triggers for these illnesses include aluminum silicates, which have been found in the lungs of WTC first responders at high levels in “unusual platy configurations.” [2]

Other common WTC lung ailments include sarcoidosis, which is known to be caused by aluminum dust[3], and pulmonary fibrosis, which can be caused by aluminum oxide.[4]

These findings have, until now, lacked an adequate scientific explanation.  But recent research suggests a correlation with the causes of the destruction of WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7.  Aluminum oxide – a potential cause of the observed pulmonary fibrosis – is a product of the thermite reaction, and there is now considerable evidence for the use of thermite in the destruction of WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7.[5] Additionally, aluminum and silicates – potential causes of the observed illnesses ofthe immune system – are components of nanothermite formulations.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that, when ignited, exhibits an extremely exothermic reaction producing aluminum oxide and the metal in molten form.  The thermite reaction has been utilized for welding railroads rails and for cutting metal as with anti-tank grenades.  Thermite has also been used to develop patented devices for the demolition of structures.  One such device allows for demolition of a concrete structure “at a high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like.”[6] A recent experiment shows that thermite can cut structural steel efficiently.[7]

Sulfur is often added to thermite mixtures to improve the burn qualities and it is then called thermate.  Nanothermite, or superthermite, is a more recently developed variation on thermite in which the aluminum and metal oxide are mixed on the nanometer scale, allowing for more rapid energy release.  Nanothermite can be a simple mixture of nanometer-scale powders or it can be made in a silicon matrix, through a solution-based technique, resulting in “sol-gel” nanothermite.  The sol-gel process allows for the use of organic materials which expand during the reaction, providing more explosive power.

In 2009, an international team of researchers discovered what appear to be sol-gel nanothermite formulations in every WTC dust sample tested.[8] Additionally, similar to the findings of aluminum silicates in the lungs of first responders, the aluminum found in the nanothermite of WTC dust samples was present, along with silicon, in plate-like (platy) configurations.[9] Whether or not the platy configurations of aluminum silicates in the lungs of WTC workers are related to the platy configurations of aluminum and silicon in WTC dust samples is a question that should be answered through further investigation.

Environmental factors

A review of WTC environmental testing results produced by EPA and the University of California was published in 2008.[10] That review showed that air and aerosol emissions of sulfur and silicon compounds at Ground Zero provided evidence that energetic materials such as thermite and nanothermite were present.  The silicon compounds (i.e. silicates) were indicative of the sol-gel variety of nanothermites, and the sulfur compounds suggested the presence of thermate, a sulfur containing derivative of thermite.

EPA also found very high levels of volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) that, like the aluminum, sulfur and silicon compounds, were discovered to be present in unusual spiking patterns.  These spiking patterns suggest that extremely violent, explosive or incendiary events were occurring within the pile at Ground Zero over a period of months.  If fires were the cause of these events, they would have had to have been fires that were driven by an agent that contained its own oxidant, as a thermite or nanothermite mixture does.  This is because extensive efforts were made to put out the fires at the WTC site, including the use of millions of gallons of water and chemical fire suppressants, with little or no effect.  In addition to the tons of dust from the buildings’ destruction and the rainfall events that occurred, these firefighting efforts ensured that normal fires would not have continued.

The presence of thermitic materials explains why the fires lasted for so many months, deep within the oxygen-poor pile, and why the fires were resistant to the extensive, but ineffective, efforts to extinguish them.  In this scenario, the extreme levels of VOCs would be the result of the complete thermal degradation of all plastic materials in the thermitic (incendiary) fires.  In normal structural fires with limited ventilation, plastic materials often burn incompletely.

The pattern of energetic events at Ground Zero, indicated by the spikes in emissions, was different than the expected trend of emissions from a typical structure fire.  As was the case for otherstructure fires, particulate matter (PM) emissions at Ground Zero were high at first and then died down completely.  However, VOC emissions occurred for a longer duration, and the extreme, spiking emissions of VOCs, and components typical of thermitic mixtures, continued for many months after the particulate matter had died down.

Other unusual results from EPA monitoring included a compound called 1,3-diphenylpropane (1,3-DPP), which had never been seen before in any EPA studies yet was said to be abundant and pervasive at the WTC.  Further investigation is called for due to the fact that 1,3-DPP is used to functionalize nanostructured silicas that are similar to nanothermite materials.[11]

Related to these environmental findings is the fact that first responders have been getting cancers at elevated rates.  Many types of cancers have been reported including leukemia and the rare disease called multiple myeloma.  The most prominent environmental cause of leukemia is benzene, which is one of the VOCs seen prominently in energetic spikes of emissions at Ground Zero.  Benzene was detected at the WTC at levels that were dramatically higher than ever seen before in structure fires; even higher than what was seen at a large fire in a plastics factory.[12]

As for multiple myeloma, researchers associated with the World Trade Center Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine examined many sick first responders.  One result was that they found eight times the expected level of multiple myeloma in people below the age of 45.[13]

Environmental factors that cause multiple myeloma include phenoxyacetic acids, which are compounds that are structurally similar to 1,3-DPP.  Another causal factor is DDT, a highly chlorinated diphenylethane.[14] Diphenylethane is structurally very similar to diphenylpropane (DPP).  This suggests that the observed presence of 1,3-DPP could be a causal factor of the multiple myeloma seen in WTC first responders, in that derivatives of 1,3-DPP might be responsible for the illnesses.

Carbon nanotubes

In 2010, researchers reported the presence of carbon nanotubes in the lungs of WTC first responders.[15] Carbon nanotubes are high-tech nanostructured materials, which exhibit unique properties like ballistic conduction.  The health effects of carbon nanotubes have been shown to be similar to the health effects produced by exposure to asbestos.[16]

Carbon nanotube formation requires three basic components: a source of carbon, a source of heat, and the presence of certain metals.  In particular, formation of the single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) found in the lungs of first responders requires that the metals be present.[17] All of these requirements were met at the WTC site on, and for months after, September 11, 2001.

The three most effective metals for the synthesis of SWCNTs are iron, nickel and cobalt.  Both iron and nickel were present in high concentrations near Ground Zero, as shown by aerosol testing done by a team from the University of California, Davis.[18] Iron oxide and nickel oxide are common oxidants in thermite mixtures.

Airborne carbon compounds were certainly present in abundance at Ground Zero in the form of particulate matter resulting from the fires.  Heat was also in abundance, as extremely high temperatures were present on 9/11 and afterward at Ground Zero.  These temperatures were at least 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit, hotter than first reported by government scientists, and were far higher than temperatures seen in a normal structure fire.

The molten metal and vaporized silicates that have been reported in the WTC dust can only be explained by the presence of an exothermic reaction like the thermite reaction.[19] Large quantities of carbon nanotubes might have been formed at Ground Zero due to the high temperature environments created by the thermite reaction and the airborne metal catalysts that were also present.

A second possible explanation for the carbon nanotubes in the lung tissue of the first responders is that the carbon nanotubes were components of actual energetic materials that were used in the destruction of the buildings.  Carbon nanotubes have been used as energetic modifiers,[20] to improve stabilization of explosives,[21] and to enhance ignition properties.[22]

Conclusion

Some of the illnesses suffered by the WTC first responders might be explained by the existing evidence of energetic materials, like thermite, at Ground Zero.  For example aluminum, aluminum oxide and aluminum silicates are known causal factors for some of the common illnesses seen, such as sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and the as-yet-unexplained immune system diseases.  Furthermore, the rare cancers found in some first responders could be the result of environmental factors such as the unusually high levels of benzene and derivatives of 1,3-DPP which suggest the presence of energetic materials like thermite and nanothermite.

Analysis of the lung tissue of first responders has also indicated that energetic materials might be involved.  The unusual platy configurations of aluminum silicates found in those lung tissue samples seem similar to the platy configurations of aluminum and silicon in the nanothermite that has been discovered in WTC dust samples.

The finding of carbon nanotubes in the lungs of first responders suggests two possible explanations.  The nanotubes might have been formed in the unusual environment at Ground Zero, where extremely high temperatures and the presence of airborne metallic species gives yet more evidence for the presence of thermitic materials.  Alternatively, the nanotubes might have been components of energetic materials.  In either case, the presence of carbon nanotubes in the lungs of WTC first responders suggests the use of energetic materials and should be studied in more depth.

These facts and research findings warrant further study of the correlation between environmental testing results, first responder health study results, and the use of energetic materials at the WTC.

Notes

[1] Jenkins C. 2007.  Complaint and Additional Evidence of pH Fraud by: USGS, OSHA, ATSDR, NYC, EPA, and EPA-funded scientists.  Journal of 9/11 Studies 12.  Available:http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/DrJenkinsRequestsSenateInvestigationOnWTCdust.pdf[accessed 19 January 2011].

[2] Wu M, Gordon RE, Herbert R, Padilla M, Moline J, Mendelson D, Litle V, Travis WD, Gil J. 2010.  Case Report: Lung disease in World Trade Center responders exposed to dust and smoke: Carbon nanotubes found in the lungs of World Trade Center patients and dust samples, Environmental Health Perspectives 118 (4).

[3] Cai H, Cao M, Meng F, Wei J. 2007.  Pulmonary sarcoid-like granulomatosis induced by aluminum dust: report of a case and literature review.  Chinese Medical Journal 120 (17) : 1556-1560.   Available: http://cmj.org/Periodical/PaperList.asp?id=LW200794512467004596 [accessed 19 January 2011].

[4] Jederlinic PJ, Abraham JL, Churg A, Himmelstein JS, Epler GR, Gaensler EA. 1990.  Pulmonary fibrosis in aluminum oxide workers. Investigation of nine workers, with pathologic examination and microanalysis in three of them.  Am Rev Respir Dis. 142(5):1179-84.

[5] Jones SE, Farrer J, Jenkins GS, Legge F, Gourley J, Ryan K, Farnsworth D, Grabbe C. 2008.  Extremely High Temperatures during the World Trade Center Destruction, Journal of 9/11 Studies 19.   Available: http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf [accessed 19 January 2011].

[6] Taku Murakami, US Patent 5532449 – Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete,http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5532449/description.html

[7] Cole, J.  2010.  9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate.  911Blogger.com. Available: www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g [accessed 19 January 2011].

[8] Harrit NH, Farrer J, Jones SE, Ryan KR, Legge FM, Farnsworth D, Roberts G, Gourley JR, Larsen BR. 2009.  Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.  The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2:7-31;  doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007 [Online April 2005]

[9] Ibid

[10] Ryan KR, Gourley JR, Jones SE. 2009.  Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials. The Environmentalist 29 (1):56-63; doi: 10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4 [Online 4 August 2008]

[11] Ibid

[12] Ibid

[13] Moline JM, Herbert R, Crowley L, Troy K, Hodgman E, Shukla G, Udasin I, Luft B, Wallenstein S, Landrigan P, Savitz DA.  2009.  Multiple Myeloma in World Trade Center Responders: A Case Series.  Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 51(8): 896-902.

[14] Eriksson M, Karlsson M. 1992.  Occupational and other environmental factors and multiple myeloma: a population based case-control study. Br J Ind Med 49(2): 95–103.

[15] Maoxin Wu, et al.

[16] Van Noorden R. 2008.  Carbon nanotubes behave like asbestos. Chemistry World.  Available:http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/May/20050802.asp [accessed 19 January 2011].

[17] Height JH.  2003.  Flame synthesis of carbon nanotubes and metallic nanomaterials.  Dissertation submission to Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering.

[18] Ryan KR, et al.

[19] Jones SE, et al.

[20] Ramaswamy AL, Kaste P.  2003.  Combustion modifiers for energetic materials.  34th International Annual Conference of ICT; Karlsruhe; Germany; 24-27 June 2003. 1-13.

[21] Patent issued to Raytheon Company, WO/2008/082724.  Improved Explosive Materials by Stabilization in Nanotubes.  World Intellectual Property organization. Available: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?WO=2008/082724 [accessed 19 January 2011].

[22] Manaa MR, Mitchell AR, Garza RG, Pagoria PF, Watkins BE. 2005.  Flash Ignition and Initiation of Explosives−Nanotubes Mixture.  J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(40):13786–13787.

Source:

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/02/04/energetic-materials-as-a-potential-cause-of-the-911-first-responder-illnesses/

Now how does this mesh with the purposes behind chemtrails?

“The most notable example being nano-thermate explosives, the kind used in the controlled demolition of skyscrapers.”

Email from reader Mark McCandlish (cc’d to board of supervisors):

To Mr. Marc Beauchamp, and members of the Shasta County Board of Supervisors

Mr. Beauchamp,

From the reading of your many editorials, I’ve gathered that unlike many of your colleagues at the Record Searchlight, you actually get out into the community and talk with the people living here.  And by that I mean you still understand the importance of “listening”.

With that idea in mind, and in view of your July 19th editorial questioning the “loony” notion of “chemtrails”, I thought I would send you two scientific papers, one from the United States Air Force, the other from NASA.  The first document is pure science and is really beyond the comprehension of most readers so I can give you a layman’s summary of what it says.  The other is really just a NASA Power Point presentation that talks about the potential of placing “energetic particles” in propellants (fuel) for military, NASA and commercial use, with the end goal being increased safety, higher fuel stabilization and energetic output.  How this plays into commercial and particularly military aviation should interest you if you have any concerns about the environment, and human health.  (Including your own.)

I will also include links you can follow that will demonstrate (if you care to do any reading) that OSHA deems Aluminum nanoparticles to be harmful enough to human health that they’ve created what are called MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets) for this material, and it is prohibited from being dispensed into the environment without the “proper government permits”.  See Section 6 under: http://nanomaterialstore.com/al_msds.php

This in turn qualifies this material as a “chemical agent” which brings it under the purview of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Statutes within Title 50 United States Code.   See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-32  Simply look under definitions to see my point.  Chapter 32 at subsection 1512 in turn requires written approval down through the government chain of command structure, to include the President, Secretary of Defense and Health and Human Services and notification to the Governor of each State in which such dispersal is anticipated to occur. (Note that I said “anticipated”.) This demonstrates that there must be a paper trail, one that should be accessible via a FOIA request.
See also: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1512

Now in the USAF paper, entitled, “In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Machrophages” the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson AFB in Dayton, Ohio within the Human Effectiveness Directorate, Applied Biotechnology Branch took up an investigation in 1993 to determine if these nanoparticles could be harmful to U.S. military personnel in the field of battle or work environment, by testing these material on lab rats.  The test concluded in 2001 shortly after the spraying of these very substances began with regularity over our skies here in Redding.  I’ll come back to this point momentarily, as your own newspaper places a milestone without realizing it at that time.

Machrophages are white blood cells.  They are part of the human immune system and in many other members of the animal kingdom. They behave in many respects like an Amoeba when observed under a microscope, going after contaminants and pathogens (germs, viruses and parasites) by engulfing and digesting them and then being filtered out through the kidneys and expelled from the body through the urinary tract.  It’s basic biology.  This engulfing process has a scientific name: “phagocytosis”.

Inside our cells, are a number of small organels (living organisms), that have their own, nearly indestructible DNA, usually traceable to the mother’s bloodline, and they filter the toxins that penetrate into the cells of our bodies (and those of lab rats) and they poop out a compound that our cells use for energy– adenosine triphosphate (ATP).  A truly symbiotic relationship. This process protects the DNA of our cells and in turn the integrity of the telomeres that stabilize our DNA staving off adult-onset diseases and aging.

The conclusion of the USAF study in layman’s terms says the following:

“Aluminum Oxide nanoparticles displayed significant toxicity at 96 and 144 hours post exposure at high doses (100 and 250 ug/ml) but they also showed slight toxicity in as little as 24 hours at those same high doses. When the cells tested were dosed at lower, non-toxic levels at 25 mg/ml, using Aluminum Oxide nanoparticles of 50, 80 and 120 nanometers in size, this exposure caused significant reduction in phagocytosis (the ability of a white blood cell to engulf and remove targeted pathogens or contaminants) in the little air sacks (Alveoli) in the lungs.  Even at a dose as low as 5 mg/ml of nanoparticles 50 nanometers across still caused a significant reduction in the ability of white blood cell phagocytosis.

Now remember that these white blood cells in the little air sacks in your lungs situated at the ends of the bronchial tubes, are the first line of defense your body has against airborne infection.  As such reduction of their ability to perform this function leaves anyone exposed to these materials far more vulnerable to any biological threat– natural or weaponized.

Within the study, one of the gauges used to chart white blood cell phagocytosis was Mitochondrial activity within the cells.  This function was reduced as well.  So the immune system is affected at two levels.  If you are a child with asthma, or an elderly individual with emphysema of COPD, you could be at risk.  And this is exactly what happened back between 1999 and 2001, when the first major chemtrailing campaign over this area of the United States began, (I remember the trails clearly) and a day or so later, the Redding Record Searchlight documented in a headline no less that area hospitals had been “flooded with residents complaining of respiratory distress”.  Since you have easy access to the paper’s archive, you should have no trouble tracking down this story.  It shouldn’t be too difficult for a dedicated journalist to go back through Public Health records and note whether such respiratory cases have increased since the mid-1990′s.  The statistics should paint a very clear picture.

Now the NASA Power Point presentation spends a lot of time discussing aerogels in propellants and various types of cryogenic fuels, like you would have found on the Space Shuttle or military weapon systems.  The goal was to enhance fuel stability, reduce things like sloshing as a system is maneuvering through the air and increase engine efficiency.

What I am aware of, and what this presentation does not say, (other than advocating for use in convention jet aircraft fuels on page 22) is that this introduction of “energetic particles” namely “oxide-coated Aluminum nanoparticles” has a dramatic impact on altitude capability for jet engines.  Here’s why:

Aluminum Oxide consists of two Aluminum atoms combined with three atoms of Oxygen.  When you introduce this substance into a chemical combustion reaction, it releases all those three Oxygen atoms into the process which effectively guarantees more fuel will actually be burned, and burned completely.  This means greater thrust, greater fuel efficiency– that is, air miles covered per gallon of fuel burned, and most significantly, (but not stated) it allows operation at much higher altitudes.

This is strategically important, for several reasons.  Because the air is thinner, having lower Oxygen content as you fly higher in altitude, combustion efficiency drops off– unless you offset that by flying faster or by bringing along some additives.  And that is exactly what Aluminum Oxide nanoparticles are.  Embedded and completely inert within the fuel until the moment of combustion.  And because they are so incredibly tiny, they vastly increase surface area and contribute to greatly burn effectiveness– without harming the pumps or turbine blades.

And at those higher altitudes, you can go a lot further on the same fuel load because thinner air provides less resistance to the movement of the aircraft.  And it is harder to reach you with a defensive weapon or missile.  Plus, you can see a lot farther into the enemy’s territory from such an altitude.  A typical commercial flight might travel at 35,000 to 38,000 feet, but a flight using these energetic materials can easily travel at 55,000 or 60,000 feet.  Still, control surfaces will need to be computer controlled to maintain aircraft stability, but it is possible.

And the Aluminum will recycle itself as an oxide of Aluminum once it is expelled as a gas in the jet exhaust and hits the super-cold air at these altitudes.  Eventually, this settles out into the environment.

Now because these particles are small enough to be absorbed directly through the skin as well as the lung tissue, they can also be absorbed through the root structure of our trees in the forests.  As it happens, two other materials are showing up in nano-scale in these chemtrails:  Barium and Strontium, the latter, a radioactive element.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strontium#Pyrotechnics

These same materials, Aluminum Oxide, Barium  and  Strontium (as a Carbonate) are all used in explosives or pyrotechnics.  The most notable example being nano-thermate explosives, the kind used in the controlled demolition of skyscrapers.  The reason being, that when combined with Sulfur and Iron Oxide in an explosive chemical reaction, these components create tremendous heat- enough to melt through a steel support girder in a fraction of a second.  Imagine then, how this affects the conflagration that is a forest fire with these materials present in the environment.  I have personally spoken to a number of career CDF personnel who have told me unequivocally that fires over the last ten years have become significantly more difficult and costly to suppress.  They burned unusually hot but officials were at a loss to explain “why”…

Now as if that weren’t bad enough, with Aluminum being a conductor of electricity, spraying countless microscopic-sized particles into the sky does something else you might not have considered:  It dramatically increases the electrostatic potential of the air.  That is, its ability to conduct electricity.  So those storm clouds that always seem to follow heavy chemtrailing are primed to produce many more lightning strikes.  In late July of 2010, (if memory serves) one such storm produced over 8,000 lightning strikes in our region, many of which created fires.  When it was all over a month later, California had totaled over $23M in suppression costs.  And since the chemtrailing started around 1999-2000, the amount of acreage burned and suppression costs have doubled according to NOAA figures.
See: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/fire/2012/8

The Padua, California fire in 2003, in total suppression and remediation costs was over a billion dollars  See:http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/roseburg/plans/collab_forestry/files/TrueCostOfWilfire.pdf

And these costs are not going to diminish in the foreseeable future.  Not with the current drought.  And chemtrailing is well-noted for its influence on manipulating the weather.  There are patents on this specific process.

You may wonder how countless microscopic particles in the atmosphere could be used to “force the weather”.  In fact, the technical term that government documents use in their analysis of these materials, as applied for this purpose- is “aerosols”.  One such document is called “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025″ See: http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

Now why would the military have the desire to control the weather?  This is probably the easiest aspect of the discussion to understand, because by affecting the weather in a specific way, you can deny the enemy their assets, use of highways, block or wash out bridges and other infrastructure with rain-induced flooding, clobber their radar installations with baseball-sized hail and make it impossible to launch defending aircraft.

So how is this possible?  It developed out of stealth technology.  During the aftermath of the Second World War, and during the development of radar guided and heat-seeking missiles like the “Sidewinder”, our enemies captured and copied a lot of our weapons so it became necessary to find ways to defeat these systems in our own defense, particularly in the instance of aircraft during air-to-air engagements.  The movie Top Gun with Tom Cruise gives some insight into the reasons and strategies employed in this combat role.

So in order to defeat a heat-seeking missile you could dispense flares that matched the temperature of your aircraft exhaust signature and sometimes fool the missile coming after you to follow that flare and explode somewhere other than inside your jet exhaust pipe.  Radar chaff, the dispensing of tiny flecks of Aluminum foil to create a stronger radar return for a radar-guided missile would over ride the reflected signal of your plane and the missile would explode in the cloud of chaff instead of inside your plane.

After a while, as this competition became more sophisticated, engineers at several contractors like Lockheed and Raytheon discovered that you could reduce the radar signature of your plane by controlling its shape in a way that minimized the reflected radar signal, but also by putting microscopic particles right in the paint itself– the so-called “Iron Ball paint”.

The principle of operation was simple:  Determine the frequency of Soviet era radar transmissions and then develop particles that would resonate at those specific frequencies.  The higher the frequency, the smaller the particle had to be.  And nonoparticles were the ideal size because they resonated at the microwave frequencies used in these radars– in gigahertz.  (Billions of cycles per second.)

Now how does this mesh with the purposes behind chemtrails?  Well, the idea behind Iron Ball paint was, the size of those particles caused them to resonate at the Russian and Chinese radar frequencies, and convert that signal to heat.  This reduced the reflected radar signal even more, making our aircraft more stealthy.  But if you float these particles in the air, and hit them with a radar or microwave signal, they still resonate and produce heat.  Up to 135* Fahrenheit; possibly higher.This idea was even found to be an ideal non-invasive way to fight cancers in the body by John Kanzius, a Florida broadcast engineer who discovered that nanoparticles of Gold and Carbon are attracted to specific parts of malignant tumors, once infused in the body.  Then all you do is hit the patient with an RF signal that matches the nanoparticle resonant frequency, and the tissue heats up killing the tumor.  Healthy tissue is more robust and is unaffected by the heat.  Then the white blood cells gobble up the dead tumor and your health returns.  See:http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-kanzius-machine-a-cancer-cure/

So this then gives you a tremendous degree of control over weather systems.  By seeding a cloud formation with nanoparticles, you can do several things at once:  The small size attracts moisture to the particles as condensation nucleii.  And the reflective nature of Aluminum in the air can significantly cool the air mass below such cover.  If you haven’t noticed that it is cooler on the days when they spray, you’re just not paying attention.

Why is this significant?  When you cool air it sinks and contracts.  But if you heat it, it expands and rises in a convection cell.  And it will take with it all the moisture that has been condensing on those nanoparticle nucleii.  The important thing to remember here, is that these particles are all exactly the same (known) size.  So it is easy to paint the air where these particles are floating with the resonant frequency of those particles, causing the air to heat up and rise, carrying all that moisture to higher altitudes where the atmosphere is much colder.  This can produce a powerful low pressure system.  It is exactly these kinds of artificially-induced convective cells that will produce huge, highly destructive hail storms and hundreds of lightning strikes.

And by repeatedly heating the air mass, you can keep the moisture aloft and use the process as a conveyor to transport moisture from one area to another area targeted for heavy rainfall or flooding.  This is exactly what is happening today– our water is ending up in the central United States where crops are being wiped out by too much precipitation.  There are even weather based derivatives that are now a market unto themselves caused by insurance losses and failed crops caused by manipulated weather.  Last time I checked two years ago, it was well over $7B a year.  So there is a motivation for these things to be manipulated.  The big losers are family farmers.

I would be happy to discuss this further if you have any questions.  This is not mythology or pseudo-science.  I’ve include some images of systems I worked in the defense industry.  These are images I painted by hand.

Warm Regards to All,

Mark McCandlish

Redding, California 96002

Source:

http://mbeauchamp.blogs.redding.com/2014/07/this-is-not-mythology-or-pseudo-science/

HAARP chemTrails and Super Nano Thermate

Nano Thermate can be variably electronically tuned and maintained in atmospheric suspension until tuned – therefore a replacement or supplement for RR 144 and RR 139 Chaff.

Billy Hayes

Hint (1) Al + Fe3O2 = AlO2 + 3 Fe is used in perforation of oil well casings
prior to fracking…. with the detonation forced ignition of C4

Hint #2 … substantial quantities were found in tthe aftermath dust samples of 9/11

Hint# 3 ….. When cooked with very specific amino acids and nano silicon
particulates… will form into mini synthetic ruby crystal
/,/,/,/,,,,,,,,,,,, If cooked with specific Aminoglycosides, can cause
Multiple Myeloma, a very rare blood plasma cancer

Hint 4 ….. Extreme quantities of this were found in the lungs of those who jumped from the Towers during 9/11

Hint 5…… components of this compound are highly RF reactive when
suspended in the atmosphere and are used for or as a supplement of or
with RR-144 and/or RR-129…

Hint 6…….. and YOU WEAR THIS, DRINK THIS, EAT THIS AND BREATHE THIS…………Chemically Contaminated Atmosphere

Source:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/381617941986020/442624839218663/

Questions answered by Billy Hayes

1) This nano Thermate is in all chemTrails?

1) Combining chemical spraying components with normal hydrocarbons contaminating the atmosphere produces variables of thermite, thermate and super nano thermate

2) Are militaries around the world spraying their populations because they’re being attacked or is this just prophylactic in nature?

2) Due to the variable ECM functionality of Super nano thermate to specific pulse lengths of resonant freqs. , it is the primary selection of military use…. the prophylactic function is secondary.

Additional information

?= Super Nano Thermate

Now ya know why the fires on the west coast burn so hot … why there is an increase of Sprites … why they are using lasers with the new HAARP technologies …. Why there is a new Space Fence … Just one of the many rabbit holes involved with ChemTrails

so they’re spraying super nano thermate Why?

Thermate is RF reactive

Thermite is less thermal burn… aprx. 2100 degrees….. Super nano thermate burns up to 3500 degrees and can also be used as radar Chaff electronic counter measures

Nano Thermate can be variably electronically tuned…and maintained in atmospheric suspension till tuned…. there fore a replacement or supplement for RR 144 and RR 139………

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaff_%28countermeasure%29

Chaff (countermeasure)

Related Mark McCandlish link:

http://discerningdem.blogspot.com/2013/10/richard-sacks-kelly-daugherty-global.html

Related:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/48299556/EBooks-Chemistry-MILITARY-EXPLOSIVES-chemistry-MUST-HAVE-EBOOK

1.   Four people collected random samples of the dust from the World Trade Center and it contained

a.  microscopic  super thermate  (aka nano-thermate)   thermite is an incendiary (aka like a match which gets on fire due to a chemical reaction that produces heat and thereby fire on the wood or paper match stick.

 This thermate contained sulfur and barium which means it was militarized.   Steel beams do not have sulfur molecules mixed into it when it was made and was molten (liquid), yet samples of steel after 9/11 were found to have sulfur molecules fuzzed or welded within it and  steel beams were vaporized to paper thin (starting from a inch thick steel beam.    Steel melts at about 2,700 degrees F.  Hydrocarbon fires only get to 800 to 1,000 degrees F.  

super thermate is an very high tech explosive 

http://12160.info/xn/detail/2649739:Topic:1160294

+++